Date: Sun, 22 Oct 95 12:10:44 ARG From: ales@wamani.apc.org (Alejandra Sarda) VISIBILITY DEBATE Meeting held on October 17, 1995, at Tasmania Bar, Buenos Aires, as part of the program of lesbians/ gays /transvestites /transexuals meetings taking place since September (see "Lesbians, gays, transvestites and transexuals coming together in Argentina) Monica Santino (Comunidad Homosexual Argentina - Argentinean Homosexual Community): visibility has many faces, as many as persons there are, each one lives her/his visibility as she/he can. It's important for the Movement to be visible as such, as a whole. We must talk about what the groups can do to help more and more people to become visible. Marcelo Ferreyra (Biblioteca Gay-Lesbica / Gay-Lesbian Library): To be visible is to embody one's ideals, to carry on those ideals. Nobody else is going to do that for ourselves. This society has been destroying its own values, the institutions are showing their lack of basic values. The media have squeezed us out, but a homosexual person on TV stressing her/his truth show a sharp contrast with other persons -i.e. politicians- claiming to be what they are not. Society is thirsty for true values. When we expose ourselves, what becomes visibile is not just homosexuality, but truth itself. Absolute invisibility is a fiction: there is always somebody for whom we are visible, in spite of ourselves. Cesar Vassari (Biblioteca Gay-Lesbica / Gay-Lesbian Library): It's importart to elaborate a common discourse among all organizations, to agree on it. In the beginning we did not have scruples with the media, we felt we had to be everywhere. Now it is important to have scruples, to come back to them because we are being manipulated. We have to show coherence, not to contradict one another. There is not self-criticism of what we do and say through the media. We risk becoming TV's clowns. I hate to see tranvestites and transexuals fighting each other on the media. To clean a "cartoon-like" image might take us years. The media eat us up, they are not goint to negotiate with us. I propose to debate among ourselves what was said, after each public appearance by any one of us. Carlos Jauregui (Gays por los Derechos Civiles - Gays for Civil Rights): Visibility is not the same thing as media activims. Visibility is the strongest political strategy of our Movement. There is always a good reason to tell someone that you are gay or lesbian: that people stop thinking only horrible people are homosexuals. It's political too: if people knows her/his neighbor is lesbians, her/his coworker is gay, it becomes harder for them to giver their vote to reactionary political forces. The new generations of activist might develop a common discourse because their are cleaner, the older ones can't. We do need a univocal discourse regarding homophobia, police repression. It's very important to include other groups that are discriminated against in our discourse. Like the demonstration against police brutality we held last week (October 13), that was organized by us toghether with victim's families, students, human rights organizations. Julian (Gays por los derechos civiles - Gays for Civil Rights): To center the question of visibility on the media is to narrow the subject too much. We who appear on the media don't realize how important it is for others, the impact it has. We risk feeling like stars. It's just a more advanced form of expressing one's visibility, but it is not always backed up by a sustained activist effort. Alejandra Sarda (Escrita en el cuerpo/Lesbianas a la vista - Written on the Body/Lesbians on Sight): It's important to publicize our groups' activities in the society at large, it's a way to impose our culture on the public. We risk closing ourselves up inside the ghetto because it's easier there, leaving outside those women who are not part of the ghetto. It's also important to take visibility beyond the mainstream media: into other organizations,schools, neighborhood associations, etc. If media visibility does not come together with many people being visibile in their families, offices, schools, it's easy for the system to make a caricature of "lesbian/gay" out of those of us who appear in the media and dehumanize them. As the right wing advances, visibility is no longer an option: it's imperative, it's the only defense we have. Kenny de Michelis (Travestis Unidas - Transvestites United); For us transvestites, visibility is unavoidable. It's important to give a serious image to society. To be seen as human beings. We are exhibitionists, because we have not a single right. Before we came out, the gay/lesbian movement did not even mention us. We are still a taboo subject: it's easier for people to understand gays or lesbians. I am not interested on feeding exhibitionism to the public but on making them know we are not allowed to work as anybody else does, that we have no rights whatsoever. It's difficult to be on TV and not believing you are a star. Ilse Fuskova (Convocatoria Lesbiana - Lesbian Call): Visibility starts with yourself, accepting that what I am is good; that takes time. Then you can become visible to your family, friends and eventually to the media. We didn't look for it, it came to us. I measure its impact according to the answers I get. The message conveyed by lesbians is more revulsive: we are saying that women's lives can be full without a man to make them complete. It's important to have many more faces on the media. Our message of women loving women is still revolutionary inside patriarchy. Women come close to us, they tell us about their lives. The message is rightly conveyed. The most important thing is to give personal testimony that being lesbian is right, a positive thing. If you don't feel that yourself, people won't believe you. Claudina Marek (Convocatoria Lesbiana -Lesbian Call): I know from my own experience what is like living a double life, not knowing if I were a man or what. And suddenly to see someone on TV saying "I'm a lesbian, I'am a woman, and that's right". It was like throwing a rock into a stream of muddy water: suddenly everything got cleared up. Alex (independent): It's important to stress to moral side of us, all the things we are besides being lesbians/gays. In my case, the effect of appearing on TV was more than positive: blessings, caresses. Visibility benefits you a lot. The joy of doing what you like to do, of being who you are, of helping others. There is an image of homosexual people that is already accepted, we have to reinforce it. But I know the person who becomes visible has to endure loneliness, besides satisfactions. Julian: I feel our public discourse should not say that there is only one way of being lesbian or gay. It's important that we speak about discrimination in a general sense, not just about ourselves'. Ilse: To say that women are second rate citizens in this system is not banal, discrimination is not the same for women than for men. Marcelo: When you don't make discrimination specifical it amounts to nothing. It might even become a media strategy: to dilute us into a general "discrimination" concept in order to make us invisible again. Alejandra: To stress the specifical ways in which one is discriminated against does not mean to exclude others, but to make your discourse richer and also to reflect the complex reality we live in: we all have several identities and so might be discriminated against in many different ways. Javier Hourcade (Act Up): People living with VIH are invisible in the gay community itself, because it wants to preserve itself. We did a lot of efforts to make AIDS a separte subject from homosexuality, but reality is showing something very different. We have to take into account the price people pay for becoming visibile as VIH+. When we come into a disco, "Mme. La Mort has arrived" and everyone leaves. In TV we are introduced as "an AIDS carrier", a "lesbian"; we compromise too much with the media. We have to reach a more mature discourse, to stop playing victims, to go beyond testimonies and raise the political level of our discourse. To give testimony was a brave and important stage, but we have to go beyond it. We have to negotiate with the media how they are going to portrait us, otherwise they use us and we expose ourselves to anything. Eva Ruchstein (Lola Mora): It's good for society to want to know more about us. They have the right to know which kind of people we are. Now they are calling us because they need rating, out of perverted curiosity, but as they know us better they will integrate us. Luciana (Lesbianas a la vista - Lesbians on Sight): There are obstacles, not all are flowers. I enjoyed participation on the demostration against police brutality, but at the same time I was covering my face every time I saw a TV camera. Work is the hardest part of it: sometimes visibility means being fired. For us, young lesbians, everything is even more complicated, because we are legally minors. If you are lucky to meet older people you can use their experience but otherwise you are very lonely. Claudina: Like feminists say, the personal is politicial. I wouldn't have understood a political discourse when I first saw Ilse on TV; I undertood her because she spoke about her personal life. I don't know how it is with me, but every woman's life somehow has the capacity to touch other women deeply, that's why for us testimonies are very important. Cesar: Lesbians and gays have been the first to openly speak about sexuality in Argentina. We have already acomplished much: everyone takes care not to offend us when they talk in public. But I think that discourse is exhausted, we need to move on to something else. I don't agree with showing a good image of gays or lesbians. Also, I think no frivolous approach to serious subjects should be tolerated. We have to ask ourselves if we are to approve of anything that a gay / lesbian / transvestite says on TV. Alejandra: The problem of minors in the organizations: how to do to work with them without exposing them and us to legal risks, knowing as we do that they badly need support? [Everyone agreed to deal with this issue in a next meeting, devoted to proposal for joint work] I agree with showing all our diversity, including those images that belong to our culture but are not accepted by mainstream society like butches and faggots. But, in those spaces that we do not control, how do we do to avoind being manipulated? Like, for instance, if we say that there are abusive relationships among lesbians, how do we stop a homophobic commentator from stating that "all lesbian relationships are violent" and end the transmission there? Monica: I suggest we meet before going to a TV or radio programme and agree on a few basic points. We know from our own experience that society does not come with us when we take to the streets with our banners, even though we do it on belhalf of a "general" cause. We were absolute majority in the demostration against police brutality: many human rights organizations did not come. Anyway, I was moved by the lesbians making the traffic stop just with their bodies and presence, by our strenght and resolution. Carlos (Grupo NX): We all need to be sincere, to acknowledge that we all have had to overcome a feeling of repulsion about transvesties, because we are/were prejudiced against them; and for men, to acknowledge machismo and that discrimination is harder on women and different from ours'. Until we deal with those subjects, no common discourse or work will be possible. Alejandra Sarda "Escrita en el cuerpo" - Archivo y Biblioteca Lesbica Piedras 1170 - 1ero. B (1026) Buenos Aires, Argentina Telefonos: 54-1 307 6656/931 9648 -- ales@wamani.apc.org < Fin - End >