Date: Tue, 3 May 94 17:33:15 CDT From: Robert Dailey Excerpts from: "Battling sides on Proposition 22 agree vote will be too close to call" by Chuck Lindell Austin American-Statesman Tuesday, May 3, 1994 Both sides of Austin's domestic partners debate consider Saturday's election too close to call, putting increased pressure on the campaigns to scrap for any political advantage. The pro-domestic partners Mainstream Austin Coalition has waged a highly visible campaign to defeat Proposition 22 with television commercials, frequent news conferences and a healthy list of endorsements. On the other side, commercials from Concerned Texnas are on radio but not yet on television. Since submitting its petitions to place Proposition 22 on the ballot, it has held no news conferences. There is no list of endorsements. Instead, Concerned Texans and aligned Christian organizations are counting on direct mailings and telephone calls to supporters. Conservative churches have weighed in with volunteers, messages from the pulpit and signs such as the one at Skyview Baptist Church: "God voted for Prop. 22." Passage of Proposition 22 would repeal insurance benefits for the unmarried partners of city employees. Opposing sides have accused each other of deceitful campaigning and dirty tricks, but they agree on one thing: The vote on Proposition 22 will be close. ... Undecided voters will have to wade through four council races and 21 other propositions before encountering Proposition 22. The election will hinge on issues, said Council Member Ronney Reynolds, who with Charles Urdy lost the council's 5-2 vote in September to initiate the benefits. "If the pro-22 people are able to get across that this is an economic issue, then I think they will win," he said. "If the anti-22 people get the issue across that it is discrimination, I think they will win." As of April 28, Mainstream Austin had raised $60,020 in donations and loans -- almost three times the amount raised by Concerned Texans -- and spent most of it, including $9000 on television commercials. Concerned Texans had raised $23,751 and spent $21,273 -- including $3071 on yard signs and $1600 on bulk mailing. There are no plans to buy television time without a greater infusion of money, Brandes said. The American Family Association of Texas has helped produce a television commercial and has made it available to Concerned Texans, executive director Jeff Fisher said. But Brandes said he has not seen the commercial. One of the greatest boons to Concerned Texans hasn't cost a dime. On-air endorsements by some of Austin's talk radio hosts, particularly Sammy Allred and Bob Cole's top-rated morning show on KVET, have occurred almost daily. Cole, however, said he believes the morning show's vocal support for Proposition 22 could be a double-edged sword. "The harder we pound, the more it causes the opposition to ignite and thump their drums," he said. "It fans the flames for the other side." ... Both organizations report stolen, defaced or destroyed signs. Mainstream Austin said most of its original batch of 3000 "No on 22" signs are missing, necessitating a second order for 3000. Many of Concerned Texans' 3500 yard signs also have been damaged, Brandes said.