Any typo's mine Reprinted without permission. Lorain Morning Journal Friday, January 15, 1993 ANTI-GAY STATUTE SOUGHT FOR OHIO By Tom McKee Moring Journal Columbus Bureau Columbus - A "pro-family" group want to put a measure on the Ohio ballot this fall that would strike down laws prohibiting discrimination against homosexuals, gay rights activists say. Passage of a similar law in Colorado in November prompted gay rights activists to launch a boycott they claim has cost the state $20 million in tourism so far. Ohio Pro-Family Forum members, however, aren't saying what their plans include. Gay-rights activists in Ohio and across the country predict Ohio will be among about a dozen states to have an anti-gay rights constitutional amendment on the November ballot. A federal judge temporarily blocked the Colorado amendment yesterday, however, pending a decision on whether the controversial amendment is constitutional. Oregon voters rejected a similar measure the same day Colorado voters approved it. The Ohio Pro-Family Forum met Jan. 8 and 9 in Columbus for the first time to assemble a "pro-family" platform and discuss "the homosexual agenda," said Phil Burress, a forum member and president of a Cincinnati-based organization that fiercely opposed a gay-rights ordinance passed in the Queen City last year. "I can't speak to that," Burress said repeatedly when asked whether his group is planning an attempt tat a statewide ban on gay-rights laws in Ohio. About 24 "pro-family" groups, representing 54 of Ohio's 88 counties, are included in the forum, Burress said. He would not say which groups are members of his organization. " "It was a very private meeting," he said. They plan to gather again in three months. Forum members are being tight-lipped about their plans until they are finalized, Burress said. Oregon Citizens Alliance officials yesterday confirmed they have been contacted by a Cincinnati-area anti-gay rights group and were asked for information concerning such a move in Ohio. Burress' Cincinnati-area group is beginning a push to repeal an ordinance passed last year in that city, which granted gays protection agains discrimination. Columbus recently adopted a similar law. Burress called the ordinance a "fundamental mistake" because it gives "special status to a sect of people who make such a behavioral choice." The group also was involved in a separate Cincinnati controversy in 1990 over Robert Maplethorpe photographs it considered pornographic. Conservative religious leaders, including TV evangelist Pat Robertson are responsible for the recent anti-gay insurgence said Scot Nakagawa, a director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute in Washington D.C. Ed Pfeiffer Preferred E-mail: ejp62@cas.org Alternate E-mail: ejp@sporty.col.oh.us imagine creative .sig here