Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 07:20:21 -0500 (EST) From: A Jay Eddy Subject: Gay Veterans Taking on the American Legion (fwd) A Jay Eddy ajayeddy@bcfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 23 Nov 1996 11:58:44 GMT From: Johnson, Kevin Warren Wadsworth To: AJayEddy@bcfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us Subject: Gay Veterans Taking on the American Legion >For those interested in the basis for the recent lawsuit filed by the >Alexander Hamilton Post #448 of the American Legion, the largest gay and >lesbian American veterans organization with nearly 500 members, against the >California Department of the American Legion, what follows are two verbatim >exhibits presented to the Office of the City Attorney for the City and >County of San Francisco by the law offices of Stanton, Kay & Watson on >August 2, 1996. [For more information, contact Catherene Parker, Commander, >Alexander Hamilton Veterans, via snailmail: Post Office Box 411077; San >Francisco, CA 94141-1077 or at 401 Van Ness Avenue, Room 202; San Francisco, >CA 94102-4587.) > >Exhibit A: Allegations of Wrongdoing by the (California) Department (of the >American Legion) > >It required a "sustained struggle" with the Department before Post 448 could >even obtain desk space in the War Memorial Veterans' Building. Such space >was finally granted in August, 1984, and the Post received a charter from >the Department in 1985. What should have been a routine application became >a contentious process over several years. > >When the Post attempted to publicize its existence and its activities in the >Department's state-wide publication for members, the Legionnaire, the >Department responded with evaisive non-information, and effectively >presented (sic - prevented) the Post from publishing anything at all in the >Legionnaire. At teh same time, the Department accepted notices from other >Posts, and published articles decrying the service of gays and lesbians in >the armed forces. > >The Department advised potential members that Post 448 was a "gay post", and >tried to discourage potential members from joining Post 448. > >The Department used its offices at the War Memorial Veterans' Building to >distribute anti-gay literature, and to sell an anti-gay videotape to other >Legion posts and to the general public. > >Department employees routinely made derogatory remarks about gays and >lesbians, gay and lesbian veterans, and gay and lesbian Legion members, and >the Department condoned such speech. > >The Department attempted to prevent the Post from laying a wreath at the >Tomb of the Unknown Soldier in honor of gay soldiers killed in action. > >When an office formerly occupied by Mr. Sharkey (himself both a [War >Memorial] Commissioner and a Department officer) became vacant, Post 448 >requested use of the space. The request was summarily denied, without even >a meeting of the War Memorial Commission facilities sub-committee. Shortly >thereafter, the Department requested the use of the same space, and the >space was summarily granted to the Department, again without even a meeting >of the War Memorial Commission facilities committee. > >On October 26, 1995, in the midst of the HRC (San Francisco Human Rights >Commission) investigation, Charles Oswald, President of the War Memorial >Commission and an officer of the Department, told David Ewing that the >Swords to Plowshares organization was "unpatriotic" because it supported >Post 448, and the problem with Post 448 is that they are all gays. Mr. >Oswald told Mr. Ewing that the American Legion did not approve of >homosexuals, that he and the Department were collecting evidence against the >gay veterans, and that he planned to retaliate against them. Mr. Ewing >provided a sworn declaration in this regard to the HRC. > >Subsequent to the filing of the HRC complaint, and during the actual HRC >investigation, members of the Department and the Commission harassed (sic) >and threatened members of Post 448. > > > >Exhibit B: Verbatim Transcript > >Excerpts from the audiotape of the special meeting of the War Memorial >Commission on Tuesday, November 14, 1995, as transcribed by Arch Wilson >(member, Post 448) on November 21, 1995. > >(American Legion) Delegate Joe Arriego: "...I don't know of any law that >says that we have to accept homosexuality at all. I know that there is >discussions (sic) of it. There is no law. We are American Legion... I >would say that if majority counts, and this is a democracy, we are against >it... this type of blackmail... There is nothing in the Constitution that >talks about homosexuals as far as we are concerned... This is not a legal >court... I'm not here as an American citizen to talk about homosexuals... >because it is none of our business. We are not in the homosexual business." > >Delegate Francis Heffernan or Heffron: "There is nothing in the >Constitution of the United States of America that one individual will ever >have to accept another individual's lifestyle." >Kevin W.W. Johnson > > > Kevin W.W. Johnson