Date: Thu, 25 Apr 1996 10:55:16 -0400 From: zevei@pipeline.com (Bill Friend) The following is taken from a brochure handed out by the New York Federation of Reform Synagogues Jewish Gay and Lesbian Resource Committee of which I am a member. HOMOSEXUALITY AND JUDAISM A great deal has been written and spoken about Judaism's position on homosexuality. While it is true that ther are prohibitions in Torah(the five books of Moses - Genesis, Exodus,Leviticus, Deuteronomy), it is our contention that the Bible, and therefore, Judaism is not homophobic. IN Scripture there are only three direct references which can be easily understood to apply to homosexuality: 1) Do not lie with a male as one lies with a woman, it is an abhorrence (Leviticus 18:22) 2) If a man lies with a male as one lies with a woman, the two of them have done an abhorrent thing. They shall be put to death (Leviticus 20:13) 3) No Israelite woman shall be a cult prostitute, nor shall any Israelite man be a cult prostitute. (Deuteronomy 23:18) Each of these references clearly prohibits homosexual acts. In an essay, "Gay and Lesbian Jews: An Innovative Jewish Legal Position", upon which this introduction is based, Bradley S. Artson posits a cogent argument that literally demands Judaism's tolerance of homosexuality. For example, the Deuteronomic reference equates sodomy in this instance with idolarty. In this case the homosexual act is a form of idol worship which is strictly forbidden as is the act of heterosexual sexual intercourse within the context of cultic practices. As regards the Levitical proscriptions, Artson argues that the prohibition is directed at random homosexual acts between men, or a man and a youth, who more than likely are not themselves homosexual. It is Artson's position tht nowhere does the Torah consider homosexual acts in the context of homosexual love. He contends the Bible is concerned only with heterosexuals who engage in homosexual acts as an expression of idolatry, of power i.e., rape, or just for fun. The Bible is not homophobic. The Bible is simply unaware of homosexuality. The idea of two men or women being able to love each other, living together as husband and wife and making love as a couple is something which did not occur until the modern age. The Torah does not prohibit homosexual love as it had no knowledge of homosexual love. The Torah does prohibit all sexual acts which are coercive, morally degrading, or violent. The same standard applies to heterosexual acts that are coercive, morally degrading or violent. Rabbinic literature, too, is devoid of examples of homosexual love. Artson claims that sexual activity in ancient times was an activity and not an orientation. Since the meaning of the activity was determined by its context, homosexual sexual acts were viewed as acts which treated a human being as an object, or as an expression of idolatry, or of oppression. It is Artson's conclusion that a thorough review of Jewish texts does not reveal an opposition by Judaism of homosexuality as an orientation. On the contrary, the texts reveal that our sages were totally oblivioius to even the remote possibility that people of teh same gender could have a loving, caring, monogamous sexual relationship. Further, Artson claims, that modern day Judaism can most certainly be tolerant of same gender love. He writes" The morality of the sex act is not determined by gender...rather, human beings imbue acts with meaning and morality. The Torah and its traditions insist that sex, as with any other human striving, should be directed toward a greater sense of sacredness, in the service of human love and caring." The conclusion which Artson reaches, which is one which we ought to consider as a guide for our movement (Reform Judaism), is that we must make homosexual relations licit. A tolerance of homosexual relations will encourage Jewish homosexuals to become more involved within the community, strengthening it. It will also encourage homosexuals to avoid the humiliation of outwardly denying their orientation and causing them to become involved in destructive relationships to mask their sexual identity. The latter will promote more stable relationships within the context of homosexual love. Judaism must accept homosexuality as a halachically acceptable sexual orientation. There is nothing to be feared by this stance, there is much to be gained. Permission has been granted by Rabbi Bradley S. Artson to quote from his article "Gay and Lesbian Jews: An Innovative Jewish Legal Position" which appeared in the Winter 1990 issue of Jewish Spectator. Zevei