From: exe00595 Subject: Colorado for Family Values 1/4 Date: Thu, 17 Mar 1994 21:21:03 -0500 (EST) CFV Report, Vol 14, March 1994 [Colorado for Family Values] Pedophilia - the Part of Homosexuality They _Don't_ Want You to See. The year 1993 was, among other things, the year NAMBLA -- and modern pedophilia along with it -- was forced out of its deep closet and into the limelight of public condemnation. Almost as soon as the controversy vaulted to the halls of the United Nations and the pages of the national media, the homosexual lobby began their "spin control." "This isn't us," they said. "We deplore exploitation of the young." And once again, those without the facts felt compelled to believe them. The Facts Evidence showing that pedophilia is in fact a common part of the homosexual lifestyle is staggering. Ironically, much of it comes from homosexuals themselves. In *Gay Report*, for instance, a survey of gay attitudes and behavior by homosexual researchers Jay and Young, revealed data showing that 73% of homosexuals surveyed had at some time had sex with boys sixteen to nineteen years of age or younger.[1] The journal *Psychological Reports* revealed that homosexuals, while representing perhaps 2% of the population, perpetrate more than one-third of all reported child molestations.[2] A nationwide investigation of child molcstation in the Boy Scouts of America showed that there have been 1,151 complaints by Boy Scouts of abuse by Scout leaders in the past nineteen years. This makes, the article stated, "sex abuse more common in scouting than accidental deaths and serious injuries. In that time, at least 416 men have been arrested or banned from scouting for molesting boys in their care."[3] The Boy Scouts spend nearly $50,000 per month in litigation against their attackers -- in case you were wondering why they're so adamant on the subject. Conservative researcher Dr. Judith Reisman has released a not-as-yet-published study which analyzed the content of *The Advocate*, the national gay "slick" news magazine, between the years 1972 to 1991 . *The Advocate* is generally recognized as one of the more "mainstream" publications in gay subculture.[4] Among her findings: * That boys, ''chickens," (a common homosexual term for underage young sex partners) and teens are solicited and displayed sexually in *The Advocate*. * That man-boy sex is encouraged by prcvailing, even relatively mainstream homosexual cultural values. * That 10-20% of advertisements in *The Advocate* sexually solicited boys and teens from within a larger pool of 58% prostitution ads. Up to 23% of sex customers wanted "hairless" or smooth bodies, while 38% used cues indicating youth ("boys," "youth," "son") to recruit boy lovers. Claims that homosexuals merely show asexual interest in boys -- for adoption and youth counseling -- are clearly contradicted by *The Advocate* data. Instead, the evidence points to a pattern of man-boy sex and "boy lovers" as a prevailihg cultural homosexual value. Roughly 10-20% of ads since 1972 both blatantly and subtly, have solicited child/teen boy entrapment. So for fully nineteen years, *The Advocate* has incited its readers into sex with "boy lovers" using American children when legally possible and foreign children when necessary. Ads for Third World trips often are accompanied by images of what could be interpreted as "boy lovers." Faced with these statistics, homosexual activists are now trying to deflect the discussion by claiming that male molesters of boys should not be considered homosexuals at all. But a recent study of Canadians imprisoned for pedophilia reveals the truth: (1) 30% of the offenders studied admitted to having engaged in homosexual acts as adults, and (2) 91 % of molesters of non-familial boys admitted to no lifetime sexual contact other than homosexual. In other words, their sexual orientation was clearly homosexua1.[5] In a desperate attempt to counter these numbers, many homosexual proponents cIaim that homosexuals are less of a threat to the innocence of the young than heterosexuals, because "heterosexuals commit a majority of child molestations." Many people fail to recall that since heterosexuals make up nearly 98% of society, it would be incredibly surprising if they did not commit a majority of child molestations. What is extraordinary is the disproportionate amount of child molestation committed by homosexuals, *relative to their presence* in the general population. In fact, homosexuals freely admit among themselves the importance of child abuse to their lifestyle. In the January, 1994 issue of *NAMBLA* Bulletin, the organization added the following statement to its monthly manifesto, "Where We Stand": "Throughout most of Western history (and not only Western), pederasty has been the primary form of homoeroticism, and it is this love for which NAMBLA stands."[6] Homosexual writer Carl Maves says, "How many gay men, I wonder, would have missed out on a valuable, liberating experience -- one that initiated them into their sexuality if it weren't for so-called molestation?"[7] In fact, noted sex researchers Masters and Johnson describe the process of establishing "homophile orientation" as follows: "In most cases, homophile interests developed in the early to mid-teens . . . There was no history of overt heterosexual experience prior to homophile orientation. Recruitment usually was accomplished by an older male, frequently in his twenties, but occasionally men in their thirties were the initiators. When the homosexual commitment was terminated, in most instances, the relationship was broken by the elder partner. With termination, the teenager was left with the concept that whether or not he continued as an active homosexual, he would always be homophile-oriented."[8] The Cover-Up Realizing the incredible public relations disaster pedophiles represent to their cause, homosexual leaders have consistently tried to keep NAMBLA "out of sight" of middle America and to play down their historical association with child abuse. David Thorstad made this very clear when he complained that pedophilia was being swept under the rug by the gay rights movement, which ". . . seeks to sanitize the image of homosexuality to facilitate its entrance into the social mainstream." Thorstad also writes that, "The issue of man-boy love has intersected the gay movement since the late nineteenth century."[9] Proof of this "stealth" strategy is the fact that the 1993 March on Washington parade organizers banned NAMBLA from marching. The San Francisco homosexual tabloid *Bay Area Reporter* noted this in an article lamenting that organizers were accused of "discriminating" against some gay and lesbian individuals and groups.[10] The article described NAMBLA as an "intergenerational sex advocacy group." It also quoted Larry Woods, a member of North Carolina's Gay and Lesbian Alliance in Chapel Hill, about the fact that NAMBLA members marched anyway in his contingent. "Most of us felt sorry for them . . . I think the general consensus is that we're glad they joined us." The fact of this cover-up is quite obvious. "The Overhauling of Straight America," the landmark playbook for homosexual strategy, makes that very clear. "NAMBLA must play no part in such a campaign. Suspected child molesters will never look like victims."[11] Later, "Overhauling" says, "The masses must not be repulsed by premature exposure to homosexual behavior itself. First let the camel get his nose inside the tent, and only later his unsightly derriere." The point is clear: homosexual activists know full well how prevalent pedophilia is in their midst. They merely want to hide it until public acceptance is high enough to safely acknowledge it. The Push for "Pedophile Rights" It should come as no surprise, then, that militant homosexual manifestos, such as "The 1972 Gay Rights Platform," have consistently called upon governments to: (1) "Repeal all state laws prohibiting private sexual acts involving consenting persons [not consenting adults]," and (2) "Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent."[12] In 199I , under considerable lobbying pressure by, among others, homosexual activists and their liberal supporters, the state of New Jersey significantly lowered the age of consent in laws relating to sexual behavior within its sovereignty. On May 27, 1993, *Washington Times* reported that the University of Massachusetts at Amherst had revised its nondiscrimination policy to protect "persons whose sexual orientation includes minor children as the sex object."[13] Dr. John Money, a retired professor of medical psychology and pediatrics at Johns Hopkins University, was quoted as saying, "... pedophilia should be viewed as a sexual orientation, not a disease or disorder."[14] The same article quotes John DeCecco, head of the Human Sexuality Program at San Francisco State University, as telling his students that "adult-child sex" is a legitimate expression of sexuality. The 31st Annual Conference of the Society of the Scientific Study of Sex featured an "expert" on sex offenders and child sex abuse who argued that pedophilia may be an "orientation," not a perversion. She also suggested that pedophiles, too, have sexual rights.[15] Humm, a leading gay activist and "outreach coordinator" for the Hetrick-Martin Institute, an organization for gay youth that runs the Harvey Milk school, a public school in New York City for "homoseuxal youth,'' says the following: ". . . I led the fight to draft what is known as the lesbian and gay rights bill in the [New York] City Council to remove limiting definitions from the term sexual orientation that we hope to add to the list of protected statuses. No one should be denied basic civil rights because of his or her orientation, whether the person be homosexual, heterosexual, transexual, transvestite, pedophile, sadist, masochist, asexual -- whatever one can imagine."[16] As these statements prove, pedophilia is not only a basic part of the homosexual lifestyle, it's also one of the most frightening aspects of their political agenda. End Notes [1] K. Jay and A. Young, *The Gay Report* (New York: Summit Books, 1979), p. 275. [2] *Psychological Reports*, 1986, vol. 58, pp 327-337. [NOTE: this is undoubtedly one of the smears of the infamous Paul Cameron (aka the Nebraska Mengele). Apparently his reputation has deteriorated to the point that he has to be treated as a "stealth" researcher.] [3] Patrick Boyle, "The Scouts' Badge of Dishonor." *Insight*, 17 June 1991 , p. 12. [4] Judith Reisman, *A Content Analysis of **The Advocate** unpublished manuscript, p. 18. [5] W.L. Marshall, et al, "Early onset and deviant sexuality in child molesters," *Journal of Interpersonal Violenence*, 1991, vol. 6, pp. 323-336. [6] *NAMBLA Bulletin*, North American Man/Boy Love Association, (Boston, January 1994). [A personal comment: any organization with a name like that shows evidence of an IQ in the lower quartile. Would you ride in an airplane piloted by somebody like that?] [7] Carl Maves, "Getting Over It," *The Advocote*, 5 May 1992, p. 85. [8] C. Masters and O. Johnson, *Human Sexual Inadequacy", (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1970), p. 180. [9] '"Man-Boy Love and the American Gay Movement." *The Journal of Homosexuality*, 1990, vol. 20. pp. 251 -252. [10] "M0W: The Results Are In," *Bay Area Reporter*, 6 May 1993, p. 18. [11] Marshall Kirk and Erastes Pill, "The Overhauling of Straight America," *Guide*, November 1987, pp. 14-24. [12] Roger J. Magnuson, *Are Gay Rights Right?* (Portland, Or: Multnomah Prcss, 1990), p. 89. [13] "PC 101 ," *Washington Times*, 27 May 1992, p. B-1. [14] "Michael Ebert, "Pedophilia Steps into the Daylight," *Focus on the Family Citizen, 16 November 1992, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 6-8. [15] *New York Post*, 20 October 1990. [16] Andy Humm, "Natural Variations" letter to the editor, New York Native, 1-4 August 1983. [A "sidebar" of quotes] "The love between men and boys is at the foundation of homosexuality. For the gay community to imply that boy-love is not homosexual love is ridiculous." -- "No Place for Homo-Homophobia," letter to the editor, *San Francisco Sentinel*, 26 March 1992. "We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums..." -- Michael Swift, *Gay Community News*, 15 February 1987. "The age of consent is just one of the many ways in which adults impose their system of control on children." -- NAMBLA quoted in Shirley J. O'Brien's article "The Child Molester," *National Federation for Decency Journal*, May/June 1987, pp. 9-11. "How many gay men, I wonder, would have missed out on a valuable, liberating experience -- one that initiated them into their sexuality -- if it weren't for so-called molestation?" -- Carl Maves, "Getting Over It," *The Advocate*, 5 May 1992, p. 85. "Boy-lovers and the lesbians who have young lovers ... are not child molesters. The child abusers are priests, teachers, therapists, cops and parents who force their staid morality onto the young people in their custody." -- Pat Califia's essay, "Man/Boy Love and the Lesbian/Gay Movement," *The Age of Taboo: Gay Male Sexuality, Power and Consent, (Boston and London: Alyson Publications/Gay Men's Press, 1981), p. 144.