NewsWrap for the week ending January 22, 2005 (As broadcast on This Way Out program #878, distributed 1-24-05) [Written by Cindy Friedman, with thanks to Graham Underhill, Rex Wockner, and Greg Gordon] Reported this week by Cindy Friedman and Dean Elzinga The top clergymember of the Sikh religion this week issued a first-of-its-kind formal edict prohibiting celebration of same-gender marriages in gurdwara anywhere in the world. The jathedar of the Akal Takht in the Indian city of Amritsar, Giani Joginder Singh Vedanti, said the very idea of those marriages was the product of "sick minds" and that they violate the Sikh code of conduct. He called on Sikhs to act to stop the spread of validation for gay and lesbian couples, a trend he described as "anti-human tendencies". Although a lesbian couple recently celebrated a widely-reported marriage in Amritsar, the Sikh holy city, Indians were not the primary target of the edict. The jathedar released his edict just two days before the arrival in India of Prime Minister Paul Martin of Canada, a nation with both a substantial Sikh population and growing marriage equality. Martin had come in large part to discuss tsunami relief efforts with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, but reporters demanded his response to the marriage issue. At first he responded, "This is a question of civil marriage, not of religious marriage. I would point out that we are a country of ethnic and religious minorities, and the purpose of the Charter of Rights is to protect minorities, to protect them against the oppression of the majority." Martin's Liberal Party, which plans to introduce marriage equality legislation in the Canadian Parliament in February, actively courts Sikh support, and its four Sikh Members of Parliament traveled with Martin. They and two other Sikh Canadian MPs are split on the bill, which the Sikh leadership strongly urged them to oppose. Martin's marriage headaches this week did not end there. Leader of the Opposition Conservative Party Stephen Harper announced a full-scale campaign including newspaper ads to contrast their support of "traditional" marriage with the ruling Liberals' support of marriage equality. Although Martin's support of opening marriage to gays and lesbians had previously seemed rather lukewarm, he responded strongly to the Conservative challenge. He said, "It's not my intention to go into an election. We want to govern. Am I ready to go into an election to uphold the Charter of Rights against those who would attack it? The answer is 'yes'." Two Russian gay men this week applied for a marriage license in Moscow, only to be turned away at the registry office. Officials cited the legal definition of marriage as between a man and a woman. The men were Member of the Bashkortostan Parliament Edvard Murzin and Eduard Mishnin, the editor of Russia's only gay magazine "Kvir" and the Web site gay.ru. They're seeking to marry not because they're in love -- they're not -- but because they're activists trying to open legal marriage to same-gender couples. They believe a formal written rejection of their marriage application will serve as a basis for a lawsuit, one they said they'd take to the European Court of Human Rights if necessary. But there may be a price to pay -- the day after their rejection at Wedding Palace Number 4, police visited the gay.ru office. They determined it was an improper use of the building and ordered the Web site to vacate within a week. But in Brazil, a federal prosecutor this week filed for a federal judicial order that would require all Brazilian courts to perform same-gender marriages. Joao Gilberto Goncalves, Junior told the Associated Press that he hoped both to gain legal rights for gay and lesbian couples and to help reduce prejudice and violence against them. Although the Brazilian Constitution defines marriage as between a man and a woman, Goncalves believes it does not prohibit marriages to same-gender couples. The U.S. law allowing one state to deny recognition to another state's same-gender marriages this week survived its first direct legal challenge to reach a federal court decision. The 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, known as DOMA, could not truly be tested until some state actually performed gay and lesbian marriages, as Massachusetts began to do last year. The plaintiffs were Metropolitan Community Church minister Nancy Wilson and Paula Schoenwether, a lesbian couple of 27 years' standing, who married in Massachusetts but are explicitly denied legal standing as a couple in their Florida home. Their attorney Ellis Rubin, who is also pursuing two more similar lawsuits apart from any of the major lesbigay legal groups, claimed DOMA unconstitutionally discriminates and violates basic rights. But U.S. District Judge James Moody denied there was precedent for him to declare marriage to be a fundamental right, and upheld the contention of the U.S. Attorney-General's office that procreation and child-rearing support a legitimate government interest in restricting marriage to heterosexual couples. Moody denied DOMA discriminates on the basis of sex since men and women are equally restricted to marriage with the other gender. This case did not deal with the lesser-known but perhaps more discriminatory second section of DOMA, which bars the federal government from extending any recognition to same-gender couples, including a wide range of benefits. While conservatives cheered that win for DOMA, it might help to stall their movement to amend the U.S. Constitution to restrict legal marriage to one man and one woman. Republican President George W. Bush told the "Washington Post" in an interview published this week, that at least in the U.S. Senate, the Federal Marriage Amendment has no chance of passage until DOMA has been struck down by the courts. The religious right groups that had demanded and won Bush's vocal support for the FMA, and responded by turning out voters for him, feared this meant he was dropping the issue. The administration hurried to reassure them, promising the President would continue to advocate the need for the amendment. Louisiana voters chose in September to amend their state constitution to define marriage exclusively as between "one man and one woman," and this week the Louisiana state Supreme Court unanimously reinstated that amendment. Previously a state judge had struck down the amendment for having more than one topic, which the Louisiana Constitution prohibits, since along with marriage it bans recognition of "a legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals". But the state's high court found the stated goal of "defending marriage" to be a single purpose, with each of its provisions serving that objective. Yet there was some good news for same-gender couples in this decision, as the justices declared the amendment will not affect any unmarried couples' ability to jointly own property, to contract powers-of-attorney with each other, or to make wills in each other's favor. Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich this week signed into law the addition of "sexual orientation" as a category protected from discrimination in employment, housing and credit under the state's Human Rights Act. Illinois becomes the 15th U.S. state to legislate equal treatment for lesbigays and the fifth to explicitly include transgenders. And finally... in the biggest hoopla in the U.S. "culture wars" since TV preacher Jerry Fallwell's group "outed" Teletubby Tinky Winky, the religious right is claiming that cartoon character SpongeBob SquarePants is "brainwashing children" into believing that gay is OK. Indeed SpongeBob is one of over 100 campaigners for respect for diversity including such suspected queers as Barney the dinosaur, Bob the Builder, Winnie the Pooh, and some Muppets. They all appear in a music video of the song "We Are Family". More than 60,000 of those tapes are planned to be sent to primary schools in March. James Dobson, head of the Focus on the Family media empire, spotlighted what he called a "pro-homosexual video" this week in a speech to a Bush pre-inaugural dinner party of conservatives including a number of Congressmembers. But it was the American Family Association's Ed Vitagliano who went beyond the video -- which makes no reference whatever to sexuality -- to the Web site of its makers, the non-profit We Are Family Foundation. There appears the text of the Southern Poverty Law Center's pledge to respect differences, including differences in what it calls "sexual identity" along with abilities, beliefs, cultures, and race. Vitagliano wrote of the video, "A short step beneath the surface reveals that one of the differences being celebrated is homosexuality." Nile Rodgers, who co-wrote the 1979 disco classic, set up his foundation and produced the video in response to the "9-11" terrorist attacks on New York and Washington. His hope was to promote healing by teaching children about multiculturalism. He did intend the video to promote the tolerance pledge, and even consulted with his foundation's personnel about possibly removing "sexual identity" from it. Their consensus was to retain it. But Rodgers is bewildered by the religious right reaction, and he told the Associated Press, "Nothing could be more devastating to the people who believe in me and our organization than to imply there's an insidious undercurrent to it." His foundation's attorney bluntly told the "New York Times" that those attacking the video "need medication." But the Los Angeles Gay & Lesbian Center seized the media moment to remind the public in a light-hearted way of the serious problems of lesbigay youth. Center head Lorri Jean said in part, "If SpongeBob is gay, we want him to know he's not alone. The L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center's youth center and transitional living program can offer him support and a home if he's ever kicked out of his pineapple under the sea or attacked because of his sexual orientation... We also invite SpongeBob to join the Center's recently formed gay/straight alliance of cartoon characters that includes Bugs Bunny, Tinky Winky, Waylon Smithers, and Batman and Robin."